High Noon for distressed Chinese credit


Chinese credit spreads have widened amidst growth risks and worsening profitability. A coming wall of maturities is likely to pose rollover concerns and mark High Noon for distressed Chinese credit.
Chang Wei Liang17 Sep 2019
  • Chinese credit spreads have widened amidst normalizing global conditions and China-specific risks
  • China’s structural slowdown and a decline in profitability have induced financial stresses
  • A coming wall of maturities for distressed credit is likely to stir rollover concerns
  • 2020 could thus mark High Noon for Chinese defaults, surpassing previous highs
  • Without state support, monetary easing alone is unlikely to narrow Chinese credit spreads broadly
Photo credit: AFP Photo


Chinese credit spreads are still on the up



Spreads in the Chinese USD credit markets are still on an upward trajectory that started in early 2018. The onshore RMB credit market has also seen an increase in new issue spreads. We think a mix of factors is driving the widening in Chinese spreads, namely a global retreat from an overt search for yield, Chinese-specific macro risks, and a rising incidence of Chinese credit events. Stresses are unlikely to peak until 2020, which could mark High Noon for distressed Chinese credits.

Normalization from the global search for yield

While Chinese credit spreads were compressing significantly in 2017, global credit spreads, including those of regional and American corporates, were also easing to decade lows. In hindsight, credit pricing was exuberant then, reflecting a keen global search for yield. This laid the ground for global spreads to widen again when risk appetite normalizes.


Our Asian benchmark, the Bloomberg Barclays EM Asia USD credit index, witnessed a compression in its option-adjusted spread (OAS) to over 1 standard deviation below its decade-average back in 2017. US corporate spreads tell a similar story, as Corp IG and HY spreads narrowed to decade-lows at the same time. The subsequent normalization of global credit conditions was thus one factor behind the expansion of Chinese spreads since 2018.

Chinese-specific macro risks have risen



Besides global factors, China-specific risks have also grown to become prominent drivers of credit spreads. This is reflected in the diverging performance of risk sensitive HY spreads for Chinese and US corporates, with US credits holding up far better than Chinese counterparts. The additional Chinese HY credit premium has widened from negligible levels to 300bps above US HY, based on Bloomberg Barclays credit indices.

Undoubtedly, the eruption of US-China trade tensions posed a negative surprise and has soured investor sentiment towards Chinese credit. Another equally important, and often underemphasized, factor was a deterioration in Chinese structural growth. Sharply increased Chinese private debt burdens, curbs on shadow banking, and negative demographics trends all implies a medium-term slowdown, even if there is no trade war.


Can Chinese corporate vulnerabilities flare up with a nominal growth slowdown? Notably, the 2015/16 slowdown did not trigger a widening of Chinese credit spreads then. But now, Chinese industrial enterprises are witnessing a far lower return of assets (ROA) than in 2015— with 12M ROA even undershooting the 2009 GFC trough. As asset returns break below lending rates (on average), we think Chinese corporate financial stresses are slated to become more prevalent than in 2015, with asset disposals also likely to step up. These developments should lift credit risk premia broadly across Chinese issuers.

Rising incidence of Chinese defaults

Increased Chinese financial stresses have resulted in a rise in the number of credit events, including delays in coupon payments and outright defaults. Chinese credit delivered a significant shock to investors in 2018, with the number of Chinese defaults in the first three quarters exceeding the cumulative total in the prior 4 years. While most defaults occurred onshore, the offshore USD credit market has also registered a wave of defaults, totalling over USD3.8bn from 2Q 2018 till today.




Rising incidence of defaults in turn precipitated a sharp sell-off in Chinese credit. From 2015-2017, newly issued credits have spreads that mostly trade within a narrow range. However, 2018 saw its basket of newly issued credits (3-5y maturity) recording a 400bps surge in spreads. Higher credit premiums have lingered for the 2019 credit basket too, which has above-average spreads.

Current prices indicate a significant deterioration in the credit quality of the 2018 basket (issued in 2016/2017). Indeed, USD1.4bn of these credits (1.5% of the basket) have already defaulted due to cross-defaults, even though none were due to mature until 2020. As credits in this distressed basket approaches their maturities starting next year, could there be another spike in defaults? Market pricing shows little optimism.

Distressed debt faces 2020 wall of maturities

One market-based estimate of the risk of default is to compare the discount of a bond nearing maturity to its face value. More accurately, one compares the bond price to the price of a US Treasury with equivalent tenor.

Out of a total of 150 offshore USD issuers in the selected 2018 basket, four are in default already. Another 17 of the issuers have bonds trading at over 15% discount to equivalent Treasuries, which we take as indicating distress. In total, these distressed bonds stand at USD6.5bn in nominal terms—6 times the cumulative offshore defaults that had occurred year-to-date, and over twice the amount of defaults in a severely stressed 2018.



Much of these distressed credits are due rather soon, with over 75% maturing in 2020. Specifically, USD1.10bn of these bonds will mature in Q1, followed by another USD2.04bn in Q2. With the coming wall of maturities, 2020 should mark High Noon for distressed Chinese credit.

Given the high premiums being demanded by the market now, and the short runway for finances to turn around before maturity, refinancing for these Chinese issuers look either impossible or prohibitively expensive without support.

As such, several issuers may well fail to roll over maturing bonds, which could result in offshore defaults surpassing previous highs in both quantum and issuers.

Policy support beyond easing needed to lift

Thus far, policy support from the Chinese authorities has leaned towards monetary easing. The PBoC has just enacted a 50bps cut to banks’ RRR this month, with an additional 100bps RRR cut for qualified city commercial banks. The Loan Prime rate is also expected to be lowered in the coming months, inducing further relief for indebted Chinese companies.

Even if policy easing and increased liquidity onshore proves supportive for RMB credits, we see no direct lift for offshore USD-denominated credits. Easier financing onshore alleviates repayment stresses only indirectly, as weak balance sheets remain a deterrent for investors in distressed credit, on top of a softening growth environment in China.

Of course, provincial and local governments, or state-owned funds, could provide funds or credit guarantees, particularly for state-linked entities. However, prospects of support are not likely to be broad-based. As such, Chinese offshore credit spreads are slated to remain wide due to a daunting outlook from a large pool of distressed credit, on top of diminished industrial profitability.


To read the full report, click here to Download the PDF.

Chang Wei Liang

Credit & FX Strategist
weiliangchang@dbs.com
 

The information herein is published by DBS Bank Ltd and PT Bank DBS Indonesia (collectively, the “DBS Group”). It is based on information obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but the Group does not make any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to its accuracy, completeness, timeliness or correctness for any particular purpose. Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. Any recommendation contained herein does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation & the particular needs of any specific addressee. The information herein is published for the information of addressees only & is not to be taken in substitution for the exercise of judgement by addressees, who should obtain separate legal or financial advice. The Group, or any of its related companies or any individuals connected with the group accepts no liability for any direct, special, indirect, consequential, incidental damages or any other loss or damages of any kind arising from any use of the information herein (including any error, omission or misstatement herein, negligent or otherwise) or further communication thereof, even if the Group or any other person has been advised of the possibility thereof. The information herein is not to be construed as an offer or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any securities, futures, options or other financial instruments or to provide any investment advice or services. The Group & its associates, their directors, officers and/or employees may have positions or other interests in, & may effect transactions in securities mentioned herein & may also perform or seek to perform broking, investment banking & other banking or finan­cial services for these companies. The information herein is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to law or regulation. Sources for all charts & tables are CEIC & Bloomberg unless otherwise specified.

DBS Bank Ltd., 12 Marina Blvd, Marina Bay Financial Center Tower 3, Singapore 018982. Tel: 65-6878-8888. Company Registration No. 196800306E.

PT Bank DBS Indonesia, DBS Bank Tower, 33rd floor, Ciputra World 1, Jalan Prof. Dr. Satrio Kav 3-5, Jakarta, 12940, Indonesia. Tel: 62-21-2988-4000. Company Registration No. 09.03.1.64.96422.