Weekly: Forecasting Asia’s 2020 funding requirement
- In fact, total external financing obligations of some Asian economies are very large
- India, Indonesia, and Malaysia top the list of funding vulnerability
- The reserves cushion of China and the Philippines have diminished as well
Given this year’s sharp decline in bond yields and extensive policy easing carried out by central banks worldwide, the markets are stepping into 2020 with little concern about debt sustainability in the sovereign or corporate space. As the stock of negative yielding debt (investment grade) has ballooned to USD12.5trln, any company or country coming to the market with modestly positive yielding issuances looks set to receive considerable bid and enjoy spread compression.
The global economy needs such benign conditions to persist through 2020. While low energy and agriculture commodity prices as well as overall slowing of import demand have kept the current account deficit of Asian economies like India and Indonesia under check, funding conditions are matters of critical importance for all economies, regardless of the size or sign of their current account balances.
The reason for this is simple; both sovereign and private sector external financing needs run independent of current account dynamics. For instance, a country like China, which has sustained current account surpluses for decades, still needs fresh foreign capital every year to take care of external debt redemption and rollover needs.
Related to financing requirement is each economy’s external buffer, namely international reserves. Asian central banks, by international comparison, have pursued prudent policies in recent decades, boosting their reserves base. We expect EM Asia’s reserves to exceed USD5.5trln in 2020.
But is that ample? Repeated bouts of foreign exchange volatility during the course of this decade have taught investors that spikes in global risk aversion take place frequently, and currencies are often the first casualty. Also, the data show that markets tend to invariably put pressure on those currencies that face the most external funding needs.
In the following analysis, we bring together discussions on three key variables related to external financing. First, we look at short-term debt in Asia. We leave China’s outsized figures out of the first three charts and examine its case later. We also leave out Hong Kong and Singapore from this analysis, as these financial centres, by virtue of being the booking and reporting hub of numerous multinational companies, are characterised by current account and debt figures that are not comparable with the other economies.
As for short-term debt, note that the calculation should not only include debt with maturity of one year or less, but also longer-term debt that’s falling due in the next twelve months (i.e. short term debt on a residual maturity basis), foreign currency deposits in the banking system, and trade credit. Not all such liabilities are equally risky, but they all have to be financed nonetheless. For comparison, we plot similar outturns from 2013, the last time Asian economies saw severe funding crunch (around the taper tantrum episode). We refrain from scaling the figures by GDP as we want to shed light on the volume of funding needed in a comparable manner. Also, we take care of scaling issues toward to the end of the analysis.
The rollover needs of our selected seven Asian economies in 2020 are nontrivial, amounting to USD855bn. Note that these figures are likely to be understated, as among these seven economies, we only have original maturity debt data of Malaysia, South Korea, and Taiwan (while the rest, appropriately, report on residual maturity basis). Compared to 2013, India’s obligations are up the most (54%).
For the 2020 current account forecast, we take the IMF’s projections. Again, India’s figures are the most striking relative to 2013.
Also of note is the fact the Philippines will likely see a current account deficit in 2020, while Thailand is slated to report a large surplus.
Having been chastened by currency volatility of 2013, the central banks of both India and Indonesia have made progress in strengthening their war chests, but India’s reserves accumulation is by far the most impressive in Asia. Taiwan, South Korea, and Thailand have also moved into more comfortable territory.
China’s corresponding figures are so much larger than the rest that they require examination in isolation. Looking at its three critical external metrics, it is clear that China’s obligations have risen while their reserves cushion has declined markedly in recent years.
Putting it all together
Now we put everything together for the eight economies in our analysis. The denominator of the ratio plotted in the following chart is the gross external requirement (short term obligations plus the current account), while the numerator is international reserves.
Relative to 2013, only one economy in our eight-country sample has seen a sizeable rise in funding cushion—Malaysia. The bottom three are India, Indonesia, and Malaysia; we expect the currencies of these economies to face the most stress if funding conditions were to tighten next year. But even among the surplus economies of Asia, the worsening of the ratio is striking, especially in the cases of China, South Korea, and the Philippines. Of these three, we detect growing external vulnerability in two economies—China and the Philippines.
To read the full report, click here to Download the PDF.
The information herein is published by DBS Bank Ltd and PT Bank DBS Indonesia (collectively, the “DBS Group”). It is based on information obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but the Group does not make any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to its accuracy, completeness, timeliness or correctness for any particular purpose. Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. Any recommendation contained herein does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation & the particular needs of any specific addressee. The information herein is published for the information of addressees only & is not to be taken in substitution for the exercise of judgement by addressees, who should obtain separate legal or financial advice. The Group, or any of its related companies or any individuals connected with the group accepts no liability for any direct, special, indirect, consequential, incidental damages or any other loss or damages of any kind arising from any use of the information herein (including any error, omission or misstatement herein, negligent or otherwise) or further communication thereof, even if the Group or any other person has been advised of the possibility thereof. The information herein is not to be construed as an offer or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any securities, futures, options or other financial instruments or to provide any investment advice or services. The Group & its associates, their directors, officers and/or employees may have positions or other interests in, & may effect transactions in securities mentioned herein & may also perform or seek to perform broking, investment banking & other banking or financial services for these companies. The information herein is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to law or regulation. Sources for all charts & tables are CEIC & Bloomberg unless otherwise specified.
DBS Bank Ltd., 12 Marina Blvd, Marina Bay Financial Center Tower 3, Singapore 018982. Tel: 65-6878-8888. Company Registration No. 196800306E. DBS Bank Ltd., Hong Kong Branch, a company incorporated in Singapore with limited liability. 18th Floor, The Center, 99 Queen’s Road Central, Central, Hong Kong.
PT Bank DBS Indonesia, DBS Bank Tower, 33rd floor, Ciputra World 1, Jalan Prof. Dr. Satrio Kav 3-5, Jakarta, 12940, Indonesia. Tel: 62-21-2988-4000. Company Registration No. 09.03.1.64.96422